CPI-M MP John Brittas Urges Amit Shah to Withdraw FCRA Amendment Rules
NEW DELHI — CPI(M) Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas wrote a letter to Union Home Minister Amit Shah in Delhi on Thursday, June 25, 2026, urging the immediate withdrawal of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Rules, 2026. Brittas alleged that the new provisions mark a dangerous shift from regulating foreign funds to directly controlling voluntary organisations, raising serious constitutional concerns.
In his letter to Shah, the Left leader described the amendments as one of the most far-reaching executive interventions in India's voluntary sector since the enactment of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010. While acknowledging that regulating foreign contributions is a legitimate sovereign function, Brittas argued it must not become an instrument to constrict the functioning of charitable, educational, humanitarian, and faith-based organisations.
A major point of contention raised by Brittas was the introduction of the term "proselytisation" in the schedule related to religious activities. He pointed out that the term remains undefined in both the FCRA and the amended rules, leaving it open to subjective administrative interpretation. This ambiguity, he argued, could negatively impact institutions engaged in religious literature, theological education, and humanitarian work.
Brittas also criticised the expanded disclosure requirements, which demand details of websites, social media accounts, and publications of key functionaries. He stated that these rules go beyond financial accountability to create an extensive compliance and surveillance architecture. Additionally, he questioned Rule 14A, which deems an organisation active only if it has utilised at least ₹10 lakh in foreign contributions over the preceding two financial years, arguing that voluntary work cannot be measured solely by expenditure.
The letter further objected to requirements forcing organisations to specify the exact states and Union territories where they operate, warning this would undermine their flexibility to respond during emergencies like floods, cyclones, and pandemics. Brittas also warned that the widened definition of "key functionary" could discourage professionals, including retired civil servants, judges, and scientists, from taking honorary roles.
Stating that the amendments raise concerns under Articles 14, 19(1)(c), 25, 26, 29, and 30 of the Constitution, Brittas urged the government to withdraw the rules and hold consultations with voluntary organisations, minority educational establishments, and legal experts.
